Could you check and revise grammer below?
Thanks,
Nowadays, we’ve
handled many XXXX
related with defects and problems of XXXX.
I think we need
to make a
complaint about some issues and have you give more efforts into them.
That’s
why I send email to you.
We want to make a
strong protest
against what IBM Lab did related with these issues.
We
think XXXX lab are irresponsible
for answering like just tuning off this function to resolve the issue.
Even though all
of production
systems are critical, especially financial market including securities
company
is more critical and system problem could have an adverse effect on.
The situation
that the person in
charge of production system could recognize problem after the problem of
node
synchronization is occurred, and XXXX Lab’s response such as it’s bug and let
customer
disable the function.
And then to use
LTPA, why enabling
automatic key generation is default? not
disabled ? (even it’s known bug as you reported)
Furthermore, we
want to ask whether
it’s the normal case for customer who don’t know this bug to have a kind
of risk
like this.
-----------------------------
We really want to
get a patch to
enable automatic generation of LTPA key instead of just disabling the
function
through giving efforts to resolve defect of product by XXXX lab.
According to
result of test we’ve
conducted, problem happened only in case WAS server has XXXX
option and duplicate entry in host file. So we asked why this problem
happened
only in case XXXX server has XXXX option and whether XXXX option have
implications for this issue.
As I said before,
the patch
targeting to v6.1.0.31 is already existed. It means XXXX lab already
analyzed the
issue completely. Even though XXXX lab already knew the reason of the
issue, we
don’t know the reason why you asked the trace as response of my
question.
Besides, we want
to ask whether
it’s appropriate action for customer to make trace on production system
with service
interrupt in spite of that XXXX could make also because we think that it
is
possible for everyone to recreate the issue on anywhere.
Please verify
what the problem is
when XXXX has XXXX option and
duplicate entry in host file through
test by XXXX lab. And tell me the reason in detail.
Nowadays we've handled many xxx related defects and problems in xxx
I think we need to make a complaint about some issues and give more efforts into them. That's why I'll send you an email
We want to make a strong protest against what IBM Lab did related with this issues.
We think xxx lab is irresponsible of answering like just tuning off that function to resolve the issue.
Even though all of the production systems are critical securities of the company is more critical and system problem could have an adverse effect on it.
The situation of the person in charge in production system can recognize the problem. After the problem of node synchronization is occured, and xxx Lab's respond such as it is bug and let the customer disabled the function.
And then to use LTPA, why enabling automatic key generation is default? not disabled? (even it;s a known bug as you reported)
Furthermore we want to ask whether it's a normal case for the customer who don't know this bug to have a kind of risk like this.
According to the result of the test we've conducted, problem happen only in case was server xxx option and duplicate entry in host file. So we asked why is this problem happened only in case xxx server xxx option and whether xxx option have implications for this issues.
As I've said before, the patch targeting to v6.1.0.31 is already existed. It means xxx lab already analyzed the issue completely. Eventhough xxx lab already know the reason of the issue, we don't know the reason why you asked the trace as response to my question.
Besides, we want to ask if it is appropriate action for customer to make trace on production system with service interruption in spite of that xxx could make also because we think that it is possible for everyone to recreate the issue anywhere.
Please verify what the problem is when xxx has xxx option and duplicate entry in host the file through test by xxx lab. And tell me the reason in detail.
I did all the best that I can to help you with this I'll just check the grammar.